Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: San Francisco considers banning the sale of all pets

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Conroe, Texas
    Posts
    1,560
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked 20 Times in 18 Posts

    Exclamation San Francisco considers banning the sale of all pets

    This is way overboard though I sadly see why they want to try. They need a better way of doing it without putting so many people out of job; especially now when nothing is available.

    http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la...,6881137.story
    19.21.10.45 Tokay Geckos: Normals, Granites, Patternless, Calico/Pieds, Hets, & Unproven Aberrants
    7.6.0.16 Other Gekko species *** 1.1 Leachianus *** 5.10.7 Geckolepis maculata & typica Fish Scaled Geckos *** 1.0 CB Knight Anole
    1.2 Pachydactylus tigrinus *** 1.0 Pyxie Frog *** 10 Tarantulas & 1 Jumping Spider
    www.SpottedScales.com *** Spotted Scales FB

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Oceanside, CA
    Posts
    756
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 45 Times in 34 Posts

    Default

    This seems to be one of those laws that isn't expected to pass but is proposed to share a viewpoint. At least in most other states that would be the case. Given my preconceived notions of some regions of California this just might make it through....

    I can understand why they are proposing it. I agree to a certain extent. I personally wouldn't buy a dog or cat. I agree that there are to many in shelters and to many animals are abused, etc etc etc.

    I would also propose their next move should be a license for people to reproduce. Or an outright ban on reproductive sex. Adoption only from here on out.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    345
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default

    That is why I won't leave Texas. California is ridiculous. You know it is bad when your family is from there and you can't even stand it. Beautiful place, but everything there has become so unreasonable. Both its pet and wildlife laws are so freakin unbelievable and bad for the state, it is funny. Remember watching an animal cops episode where they confiscated a guy's "dangerous snake collection" including pairs of womas. Since when are womas considered dangerous? Must have hurt watching a grand plus or minus per pair walking out the door along with the rest of the collection which included some other high dollar animals.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    DFW, Texas
    Posts
    1,047
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    They can have my animals when they pry them from my cold, dead hands.


    [ 2.0 Kitteh ][ 1.1 Corn Snake ][ 0.1 Crested Gecko ][ 1.0 Gargoyle Gecko ][ 1.0 Ball Python ][ 1.0 Costa Rican BCI ][ 0.1 Leopard Gecko ][ 0.1 IJ Jag Carpet Python ]

    "It'll be a walk in the park... a very scary park, filled with monsters who are trying to kill me." -Lt. Col. Sheppard

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Manitoba, Canada
    Posts
    36
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    Wow, this certainly is a big step... but, can't you get around it by saying... you must make a minimum donation to adopt this pet, and still have pet stores "accepting donations" for pets?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    477
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts

    Default

    I remember last year when I signed a petition at a local petstore in SF against this bill. Having lived in San Fran for three years, I had a working relationship with several of the locally owned pet stores (none of which sell cats or dogs). I know for a fact that they educate their customers and refuse animal sales at their discretion. How about banning the sale of animals at chain pet stores that are known to not properly care for their critters instead? I think education and stricter laws regarding animal welfare make more sense than a ban on sales.

    Of course, this is coming from the same organization that stole and released into the wild, fifty white mice from a local pet store in NC. Can anyone guess what happened to these poor domestic white mice once it got dark in the woods? Of course, this is the least of their actions regarding the "war on pets". They are known for putting a variety of animal (including human) lifes in danger.

    Now I am totally all for the ethical treatment of animals. I have a philosophy more of good stewardship towards our planet (and all its life) than one of seperation. I believe that our animal companions help keep us connected.

    End cruelty and ignorance but I agree with foxe:

    You can pry my animal companions and teachers from my cold dead fingers.
    "The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be determined by the way its animals are treated."
    -Mahatma Gandhi
    ______________________________________________
    iherp, Facebook
    ______________________________________________

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Amarillo, Texas
    Posts
    88
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    So I thought I'd start a discussion on this very topic yesterday. Then I posted it in the wrong section while also neglecting to see if a similar thread had already been started. I'm 0 for 2 now but here's my final attempt! (Maybe I'll get it right this time. :-P ) This would be my edited version.

    A ban on the sale of pets. Their reasoning: to prevent abuse. It doesn't really matter if this is a serious bill or not. (Shouldn't they all be serious anyways? It is San Fran after all...they may just do it.) Anyways, if a ban on sales is to prevent abuse, perhaps next they will want a ban on having children because sometimes children get abused? If San Francisco folks want to look at their animals as on par with humans, then this is a next logical step, right? Like what Tiger Cowboy said--adoption only from here on out. I think that a better solution is education and that is a thing that can easily be improved without destroying people's businesses.

    Besides, banning sales doesn't guarantee that adoptions will rise anyways. People should have free choice in what and where to buy a pet, no? The logic that by banning pet sales that abuse cases will go down is flawed. Abuse can happen to a pet store-bought pet or an adopted pet. If you can assume that the less someone spends on an animal the more likely it will be abused then adopted pets (which typically cost less than something from a breeder or a store) are at a higher risk of being abused.

    The end of the article says that direct sales from individual breeders is okay, but doesn't that include large-scale breeders (who were potentially selling to the pet stores to begin with?) Wouldn't that also be wrong? How many private fish breeders do you know?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    145
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default

    I think this is a very dangerous law that has a lot of ignored consequences.

    1. Pet stores can allow adoptions but how do they obtain the animals in the first place? Wouldn't charging an "adoption fee" same as selling pets?

    2. What is considered a small breeder? Who has the authority to declare the limit on number of animals?

    It's one of those laws that's like giving the government a blank check on giving away our freedoms.

    The Wildlife org and animal control seems just too fed up dealing with animals that they want to punish everyone indiscriminately including the caring and responsible pet owners.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Corpus Christi, TX
    Posts
    2,114
    Thanks
    28
    Thanked 83 Times in 71 Posts

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by Amaddox View Post
    That is why I won't leave Texas. California is ridiculous. You know it is bad when your family is from there and you can't even stand it. Beautiful place, but everything there has become so unreasonable.
    ...which is exactly why I left my home there of 20+ years, and moved the the GREATER state of Texas.

    -Wes
    4.3.0 Rhacodactylus leachianus - Yatè, Mt. Koghis, Rivière Bleue, purple Nuu Ana, Poindimiè
    3.2.0 Rhacodactylus ciliatus
    1.1.0 Gekko gecko
    2.1.0 Python regius

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    DFW, Texas
    Posts
    1,047
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Metal_Gecko View Post
    . and moved the the GREATER state of Texas.
    Hell ya!


    [ 2.0 Kitteh ][ 1.1 Corn Snake ][ 0.1 Crested Gecko ][ 1.0 Gargoyle Gecko ][ 1.0 Ball Python ][ 1.0 Costa Rican BCI ][ 0.1 Leopard Gecko ][ 0.1 IJ Jag Carpet Python ]

    "It'll be a walk in the park... a very scary park, filled with monsters who are trying to kill me." -Lt. Col. Sheppard

Similar Threads

  1. City Considers Stepping Up Oversight of Exotic Pets (Columbus, Ohio)
    By abi21491 in forum Laws, Bills, and Pending Legislation
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 10-22-2011, 08:37 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •